Tags: Easy Air Pollution EssayExample Of Literature Review In ThesisWrite Describe Yourself EssayIntercultural Communication In The Classroom EssayDifferent Style Writing Research PaperAnalysis Essay RubricSmall Business Research PaperBusiness Plan Powerpoint TemplatesGreen Sea Turtle EssayThesis 3 Tagalog
A report released in 2012 by the prestigious National Research Council of the National Academies based on a review of more than three decades of research concluded that studies claiming a deterrent effect on murder rates from the death penalty are fundamentally flawed.OVERVIEW"You can't kill someone and then go home and wash dishes.It changes you from the inside out." - Lindy Lou Wells Isonhood, Lindy Lou, Juror Number 2Upholding the rule of law is a fundamental principle of a democracy.
The essence of the theory is that the threat of being executed in the future will be sufficient to cause a significant number of people to refrain from committing a heinous crime they had otherwise planned. The critical question is not whether potential criminals will be dissuaded from killing because they would face the death penalty rather than no punishment at all.
Deterrence is not principally concerned with the prevention of further killing by an already convicted death-penalty defendant. Other punishments such as life without parole might provide equal deterrence at far less costs and without the attendant risk of executing an innocent person.
The death penalty affects only a tiny percentage of even those who commit murder.
Its effect is very difficult to pinpoint, and the National Academy of Sciences has concluded that past studies have neither proven nor disproven a deterrent effect.
Whether the death penalty is a proven method of lowering the murder rate has been subjected to many studies over many decades.
It is not enough to compare jurisdictions with the death penalty to those without unless the study controls for the many other variables that could affect the murder rate.
A conservative former federal police officer and religious woman from the South, Lindy manages to tackle this oft-politicized topic with humor, an open mind and sincere curiosity.
In this lesson, students will have the opportunity to analyze, consider and respectfully discuss different perspectives on the death penalty by listening to Lindy's conversations with her fellow jurors, conducting independent research and reflecting on their own beliefs.
If the death penalty is not a proven deterrent to murder, is it worth the excessive costs, risks of error, uncertainty of completion, and other problems that are inherent to its practice?
On the political level, the deterrent value of the death penalty is often taken for granted without a careful examination of the research or a consideration of less risky alternatives.